Good blog posts have interest and variety. The pieces are sometimes like newspaper stories or Op-ed pieces. Posts can be similar to mini- essays. Or the writing might resemble entries in a personal journal or diary. Our words must draw our readers to look further. Our regular readers become familiar with our style. They come back to hear our unique voices. For new readers, we also need to be recognizable; the audience must be able to identify with us in some small way.
Today, these examples of differing forms of blog writing interested me. I bulleted two versions of the same Congress story, opening with the straight news source. The news items were chosen to illustrate that:
- Congress does not do so well when there is too much compromise, resulting in watered-down bills
- Congress rarely succeeds against the Bush veto
- Democrats never united around the war in Iraq
- Senators' presidential aspirations inevitably color their legislating efforts.
- News - Senate Water Projects bill - On Deadline - by Michael Winter. Four short and well-written paragraphs on $23 billion proposed to spend.
- Op-ed - Bush eager for budget showdown - ArgMax - by John Irons. Short and tight - compare and contrast - of the true values of our current president (OCP) as he fights with Congress.
- Mini-essay - Democrats fail to pass anti-war bill - Open Left - by Paul Rosenberg. This is an example of why I lose readers when I get too long winded and elaborate - a long essay, rather than a mini.
- Journal - A Clinton-Bayh ticket for 2008 - Mainstream Iowan - a family blog. This is an example of why I lose readers when I do not follow the normal practices of citation, blockquotes, etc. We cannot easily determine authorship. I wanted to know more of what the blogger thought, as if it were a journal entry.
My links:
Cross posted at The Reaction.
My “creativity and dreaming” post today at Making Good Mondays is about traveling in space.
Technorati tags: news news and politics politics congress blogging
2 comments:
You might have considered reading Mainstream Iowan's Terms of Use:
http://mainstreamiowan.blogspot.com/2005/05/this-blogs-terms-and-policies.html
Regards,
Mainstream Iowan:
http://mainstreamiowan.blogspot.com
Thanks for your comment.
I just read the terms of use and found it to be very thorough, covering all bases.
This was my first visit, so I have not gotten to know your form of blogging. First, I wanted to know more of your opinion, just judging from the intro. Our styles differ, is all. My bad.
Second, my linking to your blog was not intended to do anything but to illustrate that your form (italics plus a set of paragraphs) was difficult for me to follow. I did go to the original article and finally found out by reading that you introduced the piece with italics, then included the three paragraphs quoted. Sorry if I offended you.
Come again; I will visit again. Maybe we can come to know each other's views better.
Post a Comment