Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Some will be hungry this Thanksgiving, again.

Thanksgiving Day 2009 -- Today's post is the third in a series of Thanksgiving Day pieces reprised.  This year, more than in many past years, we can be sure that more will be hungry than usual.  Because of the recession and its "jobless recovery," lines at soup kitchens and in homeless shelters will be long.  Others will be hungry because they have "worn out their welcomes" with friends and relatives. Others will be "dumpster diving" for food, or panhandling or using other means of survival.  I know that it is only by grace and good luck that I will sit at a bountiful table this year.

Thanksgiving Day 2008 -- Bountiful tables, full tummies, excess leftovers characterize many of our Thanksgiving feasts. On one of our favorite holidays in the United States, we give thanks for all we have. Today's post is an updated republication of a post that has remained popular since it first appeared in 2005. I begin with an update:

An economist's view -- "The world financial, food and hunger crisis" by Lane Vanderslice from World Hunger Notes (updated Nov. 11, 2008). Some points:

  1. The world food crisis has been replaced in large part by the world financial crisis.
  2. . . . food prices have soared. . . rice, the staple food of billions of people, more than doubled from 2003 through March 2008. . . This is a crisis for the poorest people in the world. 2.6 billion people live on $2 a day or less. They spend approximately 50 percent of their income on food.
  3. [Causes] What are key factors affecting the supply of food? [On] Demand side: There has been strong economic growth for the world economy over the past 10 years or so. . . the quantity people demand of food does not vary much with changes in prices. . . Commodity speculation has been widespread.
  4. Supply side: A major factor affecting the supply of food has been the diversion of crop land to fuel production. . . the agricultural production of developing countries is now directed to a greater extent toward producing for export to developed countries rather than to producing goods for their own people. . . There have also been certain shortfalls in production. . . Assistance to agriculture by developed countries and multilateral development banks has been minimal, and, though some countries have adequately supported their agriculture sector including India and China, others have not, including many and perhaps most countries of Africa. Agricultural producers, especially the poorest, in Africa and elsewhere have been exploited or neglected by governments. Assistance to agriculture by developed countries and multilateral development banks has fallen dramatically.

Wikipedia page "Malnutrition" 2008 -- has what appears to be some good entries. For example:

Some environmentalists claim that the fundamental issue causing malnutrition is that the human population exceeds the Earth's carrying capacity;[5] however, Food First raises the issue of food sovereignty and claims that every country (with the possible minor exceptions of some city-states) has sufficient agricultural capacity to feed its own people, but that the "free trade" economic order associated with such institutions as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank prevent this from happening. At the other end of the spectrum, the World Bank itself claims to be part of the solution to malnutrition, asserting that the best way for countries to succeed in breaking the cycle of poverty and malnutrition is to build export-led economies that will give them the financial means to buy foodstuffs on the world market.

World Hunger Notes is a fabulous resource for the latest news about world hunger. For example:

The original post -- Some Will Be Hungry This Thanksgiving -- Nov. 23, 2005

How does it feel to be hungry, really hungry? It is not the kind of hunger that comes with having missed a meal. It is also not the kind of hunger one feels when doing a very purposeful "cleansing fast," or fasting on Fridays, in the old days of an observed liturgical holy week.

This hunger is that which comes from not getting anything to eat, or very little to eat, on a regular basis for days, weeks, months or years at a time. It comes from not getting a nutritionally balanced diet. This kind of hunger makes it difficult, if not impossible for mothers to nurse their infants. Infants do not grow and thrive if they live. People - adults and children - starve to death, or they die of diseases brought on by malnutrition. There are entire nations starving or desperately endangered today; right now. And there far too many people in these United States that are also hungry. This week, this coming Thanksgiving Day, the weekend following , millions are hungry. For many of the rest of us, we will be trying to figure out what to do with all our leftovers.

A recent Reuters story focused on the just published United Nations report on hunger in the world which states that 6 million children a year die from hunger related causes. (see also the terrific pop up map in the title link above) Quoting Reuters,

Most of the 6 million child deaths a year are not due to starvation but

rather to neonatal disorders and diseases like diarrhea, pneumonia, malaria and measles which would be easily curable if the victims were not weakened by lack of nutrition.

The food crisis brought about by climate change is also part of the larger hunger picture. The BBC article begins,

Climate change threatens to put far more people at risk of hunger over the next 50 years than previously thought, according to new research. Scientists say expected shifts in rain patterns and temperatures over that time could lead to an extra 50 million people struggling to get enough food.

(BBC image) In Africa people in Malawi face a maize crisis. Quoting,

The worse harvest in a decade and failed rains are being blamed for what aid agencies warn is a rapidly emerging food crisis. What is making matters worse is HIV/Aids. One in seven people in Malawi is affected and it is fueling the problem of extreme hunger. Money that households would normally spend on buying seed and fertiliser, is being spent on transporting the sick to hospital and buying basic medicine instead.

In Zimbabwe even their own soldiers are hungry enough that there are shortages of food in the barracks and forced leaves. High food prices are a factor in Niger's hunger problems, because of the high demand for food in the surrounding countries. The crisis of African hunger was debated in this BBC feature; some of the discussion comments were excellent. Millions are at risk in Africa, but so are millions in southern Asia.

Earthquake survivors face winter hunger in the Kashmir area. It is a major crisis for the millions left homeless by the quakes in Pakistan, Kashmir and India. The article states, "As of 16 October, food had reached 440,000 people but an estimated 560,000 remained in "desperate need of assistance".

In our own hemisphere hunger is a major problem in several contries. The BBC reports that Guatemalans face hunger as a result of the recent natural disaster, Hurricane Stan. Rats ate the crops of many people in Nicaragua, one of the poorest nations in the Central America. The BBC article headlines, "The UN is to send 230 tons of emergency food aid to thousands of Miskito Indians facing hunger in Nicaragua."

Here at home, the Food Research and Action Center is an excellent site for exploring hunger in the United States. America's Second Harvest, the nation's food bank network, has excellent material on hunger in the U. S. The Children's Defense Fund explores the question of U.S. children's hunger in this 6-page PDF document. Here is what the USDA site has to say about "food security" in the U.S.:



Eighty-eight percent of American households were food secure throughout the entire year 2004, meaning that they had access, at all times, to enough food for an active, healthy life for all household members. The remaining households were food insecure at least some time during that year. The prevalence of food insecurity was 11.9 percent in 2004, up from 11.2 percent in 2003. The prevalence of food insecurity with hunger was 3.9 percent in 2004, up from 3.5 percent in 2003.

Since our population was 290,342,554 in July of 2003, the "3.9% of food insecurity with hunger" translates into 11, 323,360 hungry people in the United States. Is there anything that can be done about the recent increase in hunger? The above paragraph on hunger in America includes several references in the linked articles to organizations that endeavor to feed people who go to bed hungry. In your own city, there is probably a food bank, a soup kitchen or a homeless shelter that could use some help, either volunteering or donating. And many churches, synagogues and mosques as well as other faith based organizations focus of food pantries or feeding programs.

World wide, diminishing poverty and the predominance of violence and war will help. Improvements in agriculture are key to the long term solution. For example, unraveling the DNA code of the rice genome may be an answer for many countries where rice is the predominant staple.

Reference: Wikipedia's excellent section on hunger discusses many aspects of the problem and includes links to many organizations that work on hunger.

Technorati tags:

Posted via email from Make Good Mondays

Monday, November 23, 2009

The state of the debate over health care reform is unclear following Saturday night's close Senate vote.

The future of the public option in any health care reform bill remains as a central question for progressives and for hometown public debate, even with the advent of the Thanksgiving holidays.  Senate floor debate resumes after the recess this week. 

Where senators stand -- Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark) supports the public option, according to Matt Yglesias.  Several conservative Democrats voted to bring the bill to the floor but would not vote for the bill in its present form, Reuters reports.  We learned from The Hill today that, "Independent Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont says that there are many Democratic senators who would vote against a Senate bill lacking a strong public option."  Senate Whip, Dick Durbin (D-Ill) says he is open to changing the public option in order to pass the bill.  Colorado's Freshman Democratic Senator Michael Bennet has said that he is willing to lose his seat for his support of passage of the bill.

The White House and Democratic leaders will also be focusing on winning support for the bill from certain key Republicans, reports Carl Hulse in the Sunday New York Times.  As you might guess, the targets are the two senators from Maine, Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe.

The immediate benefits of the law are not widely known; 14 provisions actually would kick in immediately upon passage.  Hat tip to "blackwaterdog" at Daily Kos for this good summary.  Despite that fact, according to the most recent Rasmussen poll, support for the Democrats' Health Care plan has fallen to a new low, 38% in favor.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Posted via email from Southwest Postings

Saturday, November 21, 2009

Is it now time for Congress to be self correcting?

The legislative branch of the U.S. government has often looked dysfunctional in recent years.  A number of Senators and Representatives violated ethics, broke the law or engaged in other corrupt behaviors, and probably will again.  Bipartisanship has all but disappeared and moderates find welcome mainly with Democrats.  Current needs for new laws are leftover from years of ineptitude and neglect.  Congress has some catching up to do.

Self correction is needed.  Should we expect any useful corrections to happen?  Looking to history, there was a similar situation after President Clinton's second election.  Republicans took power and proposed a revolutionary strategy, which eventually included impeachment proceedings against the President.  But over time Congress developed a self corrected mechanism, according to an article written later in the 1990s decade by former Representative Lee Hamilton.  To quote:

Something similar is happening today. It began with the Republicans’ decision to elect Dennis Hastert Speaker of the House, which signaled their desire to find a less confrontational tack than they had assumed under Newt Gingrich. It continued with the get-together in Hershey, Pennsylvania, a gathering that drew some 200 Members of Congress and their families hoping to get to know one another away from the political pressure cooker. And it’s apparent in the measured, even conciliatory language heard these days from Speaker Hastert and the Democratic leader, Richard Gephardt of Missouri. Constituents are tired of division and blatant partisan calculation, and every time Members of Congress go home, they hear about it. The surprise would be if Members did not pay attention. It is Congress’ own self-correcting mechanism at work.

. . . I’d like to think that, as Congress gingerly moves beyond impeachment, its Members are beginning once again to discover how much more they can accomplish by working together.

Can we hope for a recurrence anytime soon?  How close to the brink of disaster do we have to come in the 2000s decade?  One would think that the events of the past year would have been enough to set up a congressional self correction.  What is different?  One thing this time is that we do not have divided government.  Democrats are in control of both Capitol Hill and the White House and the Republicans do not know how to tolerate that reality.

One would wish that Congress would embark on the business of self correction today.  It is the Saturday set for a vote to begin formal health care reform debate on the floor of the Senate.  Republicans will try to delay and obstruct and Democrats will arm-twist each other to get the 60 votes necessary to bring up the blended bill.

It will be interesting to watch because the outcome this evening and beyond is still so uncertain.  Knowing Lee Hamilton, I'll bet there is a small part of him ironically wishing for the good old days when the Democrats were the cooperative minority. Perish the thought!

Today is today and the Democrats must practice self correction within their own ranks, and stop wishfully thinking about the good old days of bipartisanship.


Related articles by Zemanta:

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Posted via email from Southwest Postings

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Shuttle delivers the goods to space station - Return to Flight- msnbc.com

The space shuttle Atlantis and its crew of six arrived at the International Space Station Wednesday to drop off some massive spare parts for the orbiting laboratory.
The two vehicles linked up at 11:51 a.m. ET as the two spacecraft flew 220 miles (354 kilometers) above Earth. After sealing the link between them, astronauts opened the hatches at 1:29 p.m. ET.
"We're crashing the party," Atlantis commander Charlie Hobaugh radioed to the waiting station crew when the shuttle was about a mile away.


"We're looking forward to seeing you guys," station astronaut Jeff Williams replied.
Atlantis launched Monday carrying more than 27,000 pounds (12,246 kilograms) of cargo for the space station, including a pair of massive carrier platforms laden with large spare parts for the orbiting laboratory. The spares, which include huge gyroscopes, pumps and other gear, will be installed at the station during three spacewalks planned for the 11-day space mission.
Not wasting any time, the combined Atlantis-ISS crew is today in the midst of the STS-129 first space walk of this busy logistics mission. As usual, a rookie and an old hand are outside together in their suits/mini-spacecrafts, working hard and stealing glances at the earth flying underneath them.
It never ceases to excite and amaze. Watch everything on a NASA cable or satellite TV channel.