Hello to all "larks" and "owls." Today I am again sitting at my notebook, writing. I have a cup of coffee (with cream) at my left and C-SPAN on the TV behind me. It is early here because I am what is known as a "lark," rather than an "owl." I am at my best in the morning, and begin an intellectual decline around 4:00 in the afternoon. If I were an "owl" I would still be snoozing.
Writers/birds can be self-absorbed. We think about what we do and how we do it, because we hope someone will read what we write. Bloggers do not operate in a vacuum; we publish for all to see. Otherwise, we would write only in our private journals.
Baby birds begin writing early, too. Larks and owls often begin serious writing as children. I wrote my first diary entry when I was in elementary school. And, as you might guess, I was a "serious" little lark. My sister is also a writer, but an owl. She is a serious genealogist, and probably not as self-absorbed as I am.
The bloggosphere is like birdland to the uninitiated. To some we sound like a flock of grackles who have infested an inhospitable urban landscape. And the two political camps sometimes characterize their opponents as vermin birds, who should be netted, smoke-bombed or peppered with birdshot.
Birdlanders get discouraged at times. I am just now getting back to regular posts after a very sporadic posting period of a couple of months. A fellow blogger's site, rational-rants: a rational debate of the political landscape refered to his non-writing period. It is a good post and an interesting read. To quote,
Why do birds sing? In a comment and e-mail to this blogger I spoke about why I blog. Here is what I said:After an 8-month hiatus from writing here, I found myself responding to a blogger on the issue of-- you guessed it-- blogs. Specifically liberal sites like Huffington post and the move-on people's blogs. . . This is my thanks to Carol of "South by Southwest" on blogspot for inspiring it. I absolutely an opinion-based post, and think I will pitch this idea in a couple lefty blogs and see what response I get.
As for "lefty" blogs, there are several benefits, in my opinion:If a tree falls in the forest who besides the birds hear the crash? (to coin a terribly mixed metaphor). Writer/birds do not like like the idea of our chirps going out into a black void. So we write, rest, get up every morning or afternoon, or go to our keyboards at night. . . or not. It is still stimulating, interesting, unpredictable, too predictable, maddening or frustrating. My goodness; it is just like democracy.
- We get our "prejudices" reinforced. It feels good to be validated.
- In writing, I am able to clarify for myself what my real opinions are. The
act of writing, for me, helps to resolve some of my ambivalence, as well as
engender new thoughts and ideas. The "fuzzy mess" in my head gets a little
untangled.- Self-expression is good for the soul.
- One of my readers likes the way I put disparate ideas together. He calls me "the queen of synthesizers." Compliments are nice.
I am not much of a debater, but I really like to read good debate threads. My two favorite sites are DKos and TPMCafe. TPM, in particular, has just excellent measured debates and a lot of good moderates use the site. I, too, long to find common ground.
Southwest Lark returns tomorrow morning.
Tags: blogs Progressive political blogging writing
My "creative post" today at Southwest Blogger is about birds of a feather flocking together.
No comments:
Post a Comment